Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression/Amplification in Primary Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression has become increasingly helpful in predicting responses to anti-HER2 agents in gynecological cancers. This study retrospectively analyzed HER2 expression in 48 primary ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. HER2 immunohistochemistry was performed using the Ventana platform (Clone 4B5 monoclonal predilute) following the manufacturer's protocol. HER2 expression was equivocal (score 2+) by image analysis in 2 cases (4.17%) based on the breast cancer criteria. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was negative for HER2 amplification in one case (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, grade 1) and positive in the other (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, grade 3). Our findings contribute to the growing evidence that HER2 is overexpressed in a small proportion of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, and thus may serve as a potential therapeutic target in selected cases.

Genomic alterations in ovarian endometriosis and subsequently diagnosed ovarian carcinoma.

STUDY QUESTION: Can the alleged association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma be substantiated by genetic analysis of endometriosis diagnosed prior to the onset of the carcinoma? SUMMARY ANSWER: The data suggest that ovarian carcinoma does not originate from ovarian endometriosis with a cancer-like genetic profile; however, a common precursor is probable. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Endometriosis has been implicated as a precursor of ovarian carcinoma based on epidemiologic studies and the discovery of common driver mutations in synchronous disease at the time of surgery. Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma and clear cell ovarian carcinoma are the most common endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas (EAOCs). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The pathology biobanks of two university hospitals in Sweden were scrutinized to identify women with surgically removed endometrioma who subsequently developed ovarian carcinoma (1998-2016). Only 45 archival cases with EAOC and previous endometriosis were identified and after a careful pathology review, 25 cases were excluded due to reclassification into non-EAOC (n = 9) or because ovarian endometriosis could not be confirmed (n = 16). Further cases were excluded due to insufficient endometriosis tissue or poor DNA quality in either the endometriosis, carcinoma, or normal tissue (n = 9). Finally 11 cases had satisfactory DNA from all three locations and were eligible for further analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Epithelial cells were collected from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections by laser capture microdissection (endometrioma n = 11) or macrodissection (carcinoma n = 11) and DNA was extracted. Normal tissue from FFPE sections (n = 5) or blood samples collected at cancer diagnosis (n = 6) were used as the germline controls for each included patient. Whole-exome sequencing was performed (n = 33 samples). Somatic variants (single-nucleotide variants, indels, and copy number alterations) were characterized, and mutational signatures and kataegis were assessed. Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair status were confirmed with PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The median age for endometriosis surgery was 42 years, and 54 years for the subsequent ovarian carcinoma diagnosis. The median time between the endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma was 10 (7-30) years. The data showed that all paired samples harbored one or more shared somatic mutations. Non-silent mutations in cancer-associated genes were frequent in endometriosis; however, the same mutations were never observed in subsequent carcinomas. The degree of clonal dominance, demonstrated by variant allele frequency, showed a positive correlation with the time to cancer diagnosis (Spearman's rho 0.853, P < 0.001). Mutations in genes associated with immune escape were the most conserved between paired samples, and regions harboring these genes were frequently affected by copy number alterations in both sample types. Mutational burdens and mutation signatures suggested faulty DNA repair mechanisms in all cases. LARGE SCALE DATA: Datasets are available in the supplementary tables. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Even though we located several thousands of surgically removed endometriomas between 1998 and 2016, only 45 paired samples were identified and even fewer, 11 cases, were eligible for sequencing. The observed high level of intra- and inter-heterogeneity in both groups (endometrioma and carcinoma) argues for further studies of the alleged genetic association. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The observation of shared somatic mutations in all paired samples supports a common cellular origin for ovarian endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma. However, contradicting previous conclusions, our data suggest that cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis years prior to the carcinoma were not directly associated with the malignant transformation. Rather, a resilient ovarian endometriosis may delay tumorigenesis. Furthermore, the data indicate that genetic alterations affecting the immune response are early and significant events. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The present work has been funded by the Sjöberg Foundation (2021-01145 to K.S.; 2022-01-11:4 to A.S.), Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (965552 to K.S.; 40615 to I.H.; 965065 to A.S.), Swedish Cancer Society (21-1848 to K.S.; 21-1684 to I.H.; 22-2080 to A.S.), BioCARE-A Strategic Research Area at Lund University (I.H. and S.W.-F.), Mrs Berta Kamprad's Cancer Foundation (FBKS-2019-28, I.H.), Cancer and Allergy Foundation (10381, I.H.), Region Västra Götaland (A.S.), Sweden's Innovation Agency (2020-04141, A.S.), Swedish Research Council (2021-01008, A.S.), Roche in collaboration with the Swedish Society of Gynecological Oncology (S.W.-F.), Assar Gabrielsson Foundation (FB19-86, C.M.), and the Lena Wäpplings Foundation (C.M.). A.S. declares stock ownership and is also a board member in Tulebovaasta, SiMSen Diagnostics, and Iscaff Pharma. A.S. has also received travel support from EMBL, Precision Medicine Forum, SLAS, and bioMCC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Assessment of endometrial carcinoma on biopsy as a predictor of final surgical pathology: Are we doing it right? A completed audit cycle and recommendations.

Background: Typing and grading of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) on small biopsy specimens is crucial to determine the need for full surgical staging. Histological subtype and grade are key factors available for risk stratification before surgery. However, this can be diagnostically challenging on small biopsy specimens, especially when morphologic features are subtle or overlapping. Aims: The aims of this audit were to assess concordance of endometrial carcinomas on biopsy specimens with hysterectomy specimens and to determine if the immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel being used in our practice was adequately subtyping ECs. Settings and Design: The audit was approved by the Clinical Effectiveness Team of the Royal College of Pathologists (UK) as meeting all the criteria and standards set out by the College. Materials and Methods: Biopsies from 67 cases of EC were compared for histological subtype and grade of endometrioid carcinoma with resection specimens. A re-audit was carried out on 59 cases after implementation of changes recommended by the initial audit. Results: Two of 35 (6%) tumours defined as G1 on biopsy were upgraded (to G2) on final pathology, as was one of 7 (14%) G2 tumours (to G3). One of these cases had solid areas just amounting to more than 6% on resection. In the second case, a comment was made that assessment had been difficult as the specimen was suboptimally fixed, but nuclei appeared atypical. Of seven G2 biopsies, one case was upgraded to grade 3 on final pathology based on proportion of solid areas. Our data show lower rates of discordance as compared to previous studies and on re-audit, the concordance between endometrioid and nonendometrioid serous carcinoma improved with the addition of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) to biopsies. Conclusions: PTEN IHC can complement other stains and aid in the distinction of grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma from serous carcinoma on endometrial biopsies.

To study the expression of estrogen, progesterone receptor and p53 immunohistochemistry markers in subtyping endometrial carcinoma.

Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide. Aim and Objectives: To study the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers in subtyping endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 cases of carcinoma endometrium submitted during January 2016 to October 2018 were included in our study. The ER, PR and p53 expressions were scored as per the adopted scoring system. Agreement between ER, PR and p53 IHC expression and the consensus HE diagnosis, FIGO grading and tumour staging were assessed using Chi square tests. Results: There was a statistical association between ER, PR and p53 status and tumour histologic type with a P value < 0.01. There was no statistical significance observed between ER and PR expressions and different FIGO grades. Statistical significance (P = 0.036) between p53 and different FIGO grades seen. No statistical significance was observed between ER, PR and p53 expressions and different tumour stages and tumour invasiveness. There was a statistical association between ER and PR status and lymph node metastasis. p53 did not show a statistical significance. Conclusion: Combination of ER, PR and p53 IHC markers can be used to distinguish type 1 and type 2 endometrial cancers. PR expression is more specific than ER in endometrioid carcinomas. p53 expression is more specific in serous carcinoma, however, p53 IHC alone cannot be used to distinguish different grades of endometrioid carcinomas as there is variability of staining in endometrioid carcinomas.

Keratinization in atypical glandular cell clusters as a cytological clue to endometrioid carcinoma on cervical cytology.

INTRODUCTION: Specific diagnosis of endometrial carcinomas on cervical cytology is difficult with few useful cytomorphological clues reported. This study reviews a cohort of cervical cytology to investigate the presence of keratinization in atypical glandular cells (AGC), an undescribed cytomorphological clue for identifying endometrial endometrioid carcinomas on cervical cytology. METHODS: Cervical cytology slides from patients with a histologic diagnosis of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma were reviewed for the presence of keratinization associated with AGCs. Corresponding histology slides were reviewed for tumour grading and degree of squamous differentiation. RESULTS: In total, 42 cases of cervical cytology specimens from 41 patients were retrieved, including 7 (16.7%) with keratinization associated with AGCs seen and 35 (83.3%) without. Comparison of histologic grading did not demonstrate an association with the presence of keratinization on cytology (p = 0.565). Corresponding histology slides were available for 37 cases. Cytologic and histologic keratinization were associated statistically (p = 0.002). Frank keratinization was seen on histologic slides of five cases, with four also showing cytologic keratinization. Area of squamous differentiation, including squamous morule formation, did not correlate with keratinization on cytologic preparation (p = 0.185). CONCLUSION: Histologic and cytologic keratinization are observed in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Such is reflected in cervical cytology by the presence of orangeophilic, rigid and acellular fragments within or associated with AGC clusters. Keratinization, when identified with AGCs, should be regarded as a cytologic clue suggestive of an endometroid carcinoma of endometrial origin.

Applicability of the FDA-approved Immunohistochemical Panel for Identification of MMRd Phenotype in Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Ventana MMR RxDx Panel as the first immunohistochemical companion diagnostic test for identification of tumors with mismatch repair (MMR) status. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of this test in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. We assessed the MMR/MSI concordance rate in 140 cases of endometrioid carcinoma. MMR status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (MMR-IHC), and MSI status was evaluated by PCR-based analysis (MSI-PCR). Potential molecular mechanisms responsible for MSH6 staining variations were also analyzed. Immunohistochemistry showed that 34 tumors (24.3%) were MMRd; these included 26 with combined MLH1/PMS2 loss, 2 with combined MSH2/MSH6 loss, and 6 with isolated MSH6 loss. Heterogeneous MSH6 loss was found in 10 tumors and was recognized only in tumors with combined MLH1/PMS2 loss. Eight of 10 tumors with heterogeneous MSH6 loss harbored MSH6 C8 tract instability, suggesting a secondary somatic event after MLH1/PMS2 loss. MSI-PCR revealed that 102 tumors were MSS, 4 were MSI-low, and 34 were MSI-high. Consequently, MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR showed perfect concordance (kappa=0.080, P <0.0001). However, 10 of the 34 MSI-high tumors, including the 6 tumors with isolated MSH6 loss, showed only minimal microsatellite shift by MSI-PCR, which may have been erroneously interpreted as MSS or MSI-low. On the basis of these findings, we consider that the FDA-approved immunohistochemical panel can detect MMR variations consistently and is more accurate than MSI-PCR for determining the applicability of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of endometrioid carcinomas.

POLE exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial carcinoma: a case report.

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) harboring POLE exonuclease domain mutations occurs in 5-15% of ECs and frequently affects young women with low body mass index (BMI). It presents at early stage as high grade endometrioid histotype with intense tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and has good clinical outcomes and favorable prognosis. In this article we report the case of a 32-year-old woman with endometriod EC (EEC) exhibiting a "ultramutated" molecular profile and an excellent prognosis despite tumor size and grading. Herein, to highlight the importance of defining POLE status in ECs for both clinical and therapeutic implications for patients.

[Uterine POLE mutant endometrioid carcinoma combined with human papilloma virus-associated cervical adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review].

Independent primary uterine and cervical adenocarcinoma are rare and difficult to identify their origins, which makes treatment decision difficult. A 46-year-old female with endometrioid carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated of the uterine cervix was reported. The patient presented with increased menstrual flow, contact bleeding and watery leucorrhea for more than one year, and the imaging findings showed abnormal uterine morphology, irregular margins, and multiple abnormal signals in uterine cavity and myometrium, which suggested multiple leiomyomas of the uterus. The signal intensity in the right muscle layer was markedly enhanced, suggesting a smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential. A large number of cystic hypointensity was seen in the cervix, and multiple cysts were considered. The initial preoperative diagnosis was multiple leiomyoma of the uterus, and a hysterectomy operation was planned. During the operation, the uterus was sent for frozen sections. There was a mass in the endometrium of the fundus, with a soft grayish-red cut surface and a clear border with the myometrium, and there was a grayish-white nodule in the cervix with a hard grayish-white cut surface. The two masses were well demarcated from each other, and the distance between them was 30 mm. The result of the frozen sections indicated the malignant tumor of the endometrium, and the extended hysterectomy+pelvic lymphadenectomy+partial resection of the greater omentum was performed. After the operation, the paraffin sections were sent to the Department of Pathology of the Peking University Third Hospital for histochemistry, POLE gene sequencing and HPV RNAscope tests, and the final diagnosis was a synchronous endometrioid carcinoma (POLE-mutant according to the WHO classification) and an adenocarcinoma, HPV-associated of the uterine cervix. Now the patient had been treated with 2 cycles of chemotherapy and her condition was fine. Through the analysis of the histological, immunohistochemical and molecular detection results of this case, the importance of applying HPV RNAscope and TCGA molecular typing in the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinomas and endometrial carcinomas was emphasized. At the same time, gynecologists should not blindly rely on intraoperative frozen sections, and should pay attention to preoperative pathological examination, and make appropriate operation methods according to the results in order to prevent passivity in the surgery.

ß-catenin, Pax2, and Pten Panel Identifies Precancers Among Histologically Subdiagnostic Endometrial Lesions.

Despite refinements in histologic criteria for the diagnosis of endometrioid precancers, many challenging cases are encountered in daily practice, creating diagnostic uncertainty and suboptimal patient management. Recently, an immunohistochemical 3-marker panel consisting of ß-catenin, Pax2, and Pten was identified as a useful diagnostic adjunct. However, previous studies focused either on cancers or diagnostically unambiguous precancers, leaving questions about the applicability and utility of the panel in endometria with architectural features near or below the threshold of accepted histologic criteria for endometrioid precancers. Here, in a retrospective study of 90 patients, we evaluated the performance of the 3-marker panel. Notably, the panel detected a subset of disordered proliferative endometria (8/44, 18%), nonatypical hyperplasias (19/40, 48%), and cases with ambiguous features (3/6, 50%) with aberrancy for ≥1 markers. Marker-aberrant cases were more likely to progress to endometrioid precancer or cancer ( P =0.0002). Patterns of marker aberrancy in the index and progressor cases from individual patients provided evidence for origin in a common precursor, and next-generation sequencing of the progressor cases rationalized marker aberrancy for ß-catenin and Pten. The results unequivocally demonstrate that some lesions that do not approach current histologic thresholds are bona fide neoplastic precursors with clinically-relevant driver events that can be detected by the 3-marker panel. The findings provide further validation for the diagnostic utility of the panel in clinical practice and its application in difficult or ambiguous cases.

Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis in a patient with pelvic organ prolapse-case report.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis is a frequent finding in endometrial carcinoma patients. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma is the most common type of endometrial carcinoma; however, endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis is extremely rare. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we describe a 69-year-old woman who required surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The patient had been postmenopausal for 20 years and had no abnormal bleeding after menopause. The patient underwent transvaginal hysterectomy, repair of anterior and posterior vaginal walls, ischium fascial fixation and repair of an old perineal laceration. Histological examination of surgical specimens revealed endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were then performed. The postoperative histopathological diagnosis was stage IB endometrial cancer (endometrioid carcinoma G2). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis (EC-AIA) is a rare entity and the early diagnosis is difficult. Adequate preoperative assessment and enhanced inquiry of occult clinical symptoms of postmenopausal women before hysterectomy may contribute to the diagnosis of EC-AIA preoperatively.

Nuclear ß-Catenin Expression in the Context of Abnormal p53 Expression Indicates a Nonserous Histotype in Endometrial Carcinoma.

The interobserver reproducibility is poor for histotyping within the p53-abnormal molecular category of endometrial carcinomas (ECs); therefore, biomarkers that improve histologic classification are useful. ß-catenin has been proposed to have prognostic significance in specific clinicopathologic and molecular contexts. The diagnostic utility for ß-catenin expression patterns in determining the histotype of p53-abnormal ECs has not been well studied. We identified ECs molecularly classified as "p53-abnormal." The p53-abnormal classification was assigned when (1) no POLE exonuclease domain hotspot mutations identified, (2) mismatch-repair protein expression was retained, and (3) abnormal p53 expression (null or overexpression) was present. Morphology was re-reviewed and ß-catenin immunohistochemistry was scored as abnormal (nuclear) or normal (membranous, non-nuclear). Eighty ECs were identified in the "p53-abnormal" category; 27 (33.75%) were uterine serous carcinomas, and 53 were of nonserous histotype: 28 uterine carcinosarcomas (35%), 16 endometrioid carcinomas (20%), 2 clear cell carcinomas (2.5%), and 7 high-grade EC with ambiguous morphology (8.75%). All 27 uterine serous carcinomas demonstrated membranous ß-catenin staining. Of the 53 nonserous ECs, 11 (21%) showed abnormal ß-catenin expression: 6 endometrioid carcinomas, 4 uterine carcinosarcoma, and 1 high-grade EC with ambiguous morphology. The specificity of abnormal ß-catenin expression for nonserous EC is high (100%) but the sensitivity is low (21%) with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 60%, respectively. Our data shows that abnormal ß-catenin expression in the context of p53-abnormal EC is highly specific, but not sensitive, for nonserous ECs and may be of value as part of a panel in classifying high-grade EC, particularly to exclude uterine serous carcinoma when nuclear staining is present.

Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma Resembling Cutaneous Pilomatrix Carcinoma: A Case Report of an Aggressive Neoplasm in a Young Woman With Diffusely Aberrant Beta-catenin Expression and Associated Morular Metaplasia and Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma-type Change.

Endometrioid carcinoma with histopathologic resemblance to cutaneous pilomatrix carcinoma with mutations in the gene encoding beta-catenin, CTNNB1 are rare. There are minimal numbers of reports of high-grade tumors with this divergent differentiation in the literature. We report the case of a 29-yr-old female with an unusual presentation of endometrial cancer with overall histologic appearance indicative of a recently reported aggressive subtype of Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IVB grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma with features resembling cutaneous pilomatrix carcinoma. She was treated with a primary chemotherapy regimen with an initial significant response to treatment before developing symptomatic brain metastasis for which she underwent whole-brain radiotherapy. We discuss the unusual histologic and radiologic presentation as well as her individual management throughout this case report. The apparent association with morular metaplasia and atypical polypoid adenomyoma suggests that this rare carcinoma is within a spectrum of lesions associated with aberrant beta-catenin expression/beta-catenin mutation. Its aggressive nature highlights the importance of early recognition of this rare lesion.

It is not the time to abandon intraoperative frozen section in endometrioid adenocarcinoma: A large-scale, multi-center, and retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Stage IB (deep myometrial invasion) high-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA), regardless of LVSI status, is classified into high-intermediate risk groups, requiring surgical lymph node staging. Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) is commonly used, but its adequacy and reliability vary between reports. Hence, we determined the utility of IFS in identification of high-risk factors, including deep myometrial invasion and high-grade. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 9,985 cases operated with hysterectomy and diagnosed with FIGO stage I/II EA in postoperative paraffin section (PS) results at 30 Chinese hospitals from 2000 to 2019. We determined diagnostic performance of IFS and investigated whether the addition of IFS to preoperative biopsy and imaging could improve identification of high-risk factors. RESULTS: IFS and postoperative PS presented the highest concordance in assessing deep myometrial invasion (Kappa: 0.834), followed by intraoperative gross examination (IGE Kappa: 0.643), MRI (Kappa: 0.395), and CT (Kappa: 0.207). IFS and postoperative PS presented the highest concordance for high-grade EA (Kappa: 0.585) compared to diagnostic curettage (D&C 0.226) and hysteroscope (Hys 0.180). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting deep myometrial invasion were 86.21 and 97.20% for IFS versus 51.72 and 88.81% for MRI, 68.97 and 94.41% for IGE. These figures for detecting high-grade EA were 58.21 and 96.50% for IFS versus 16.42 and 98.83% for D&C, 13.43 and 98.64% for Hys. Parallel strategies, including MRI-IFS (Kappa: 0.626), D&C-IFS (Kappa: 0.595), and Hys-IFS (Kappa: 0.578) improved the diagnostic efficiencies of individual preoperative examinations. Based on the high sensitivity of IFS, parallel strategies improved the sensitivities of preoperative examinations to 89.66% (MRI), 64.18% (D&C), 62.69% (Hys), respectively, and these differences were statistically significant (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: IFS presented reasonable agreement rates predicting postoperative PS results, including deep myometrial invasion and high-grade. IFS helps identify high-intermediate risk patients in preoperative biopsy and MRI and guides intraoperative lymphadenectomy decisions in EA.

Clinicopathologic Features and the Loss of ARID1A Expression in Ovarian Seromucinous Borderline Tumors and Seromucinous Carcinomas.

The current study highlighted the ARID1A and SALL4 expression and described histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of ovarian seromucinous tumors (SMTs) including borderline tumors (SMBTs) and seromucinous carcinomas (SMC; namely as endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation according to WHO 2020 classification). The clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 38 SMTs were analyzed, including ARID1A, SALL4, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), TP53, keratin 7, keratin 20, CEA, CDX2, WT1, PAX2, and PAX8. SMCs and SMBTs comprised 68.4% (n = 26) and 31.6% (n = 12) of all SMTs, respectively, studied. The mean age of diagnosis was 47.4 years and 41.4 years, and the mean size was 9 cm and 7.45 cm for SMC and SMBT, respectively. There was endometriosis or endometriotic cyst in 61.5% of SMCs and 50% of SMBTs. Immunohistochemically, loss of ARID1A staining was observed in 15 (65.2%) of 26 SMCs, and 3 (33.3%) of the 12 SMBTs. Only one SMC showed focal SALL4 positivity. All SMTs were positive for ER, PR, PAX8, and keratin 7. SMTs were negative for WT1, keratin 20, CDX2, and CEA (negative in 66.7% to 92.3% of the cases). While all SMBTs and 24 (92.3%) of 26 SMCs exhibited "wild-type" TP53 staining, 2 (7.7%) SMCs, both were stage III, showed mutant type TP53 overexpression. We indicate there is a similarity between SMC and SMBT according to the immunohistochemical features. SMBTs are keratin 7, ER, PR positive tumors, and some of them have loss of ARID1A expression and are likely to develop in the background of endometriosis similar to SMC.

Tumor Budding is an Independent Prognostic Factor to Predict Overall Survival in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Objective. Tumor budding defined as a tumor cell nest away from the main tumor, has been found to be associated with prognostic parameters in many cancer types. We aimed to investigate the relationship between tumor budding and clinicopathological parameters in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, as well as its prognostic importance. Materials and Methods. One hundred four patients who underwent surgical resection with diagnosis of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas between June 2011 and May 2020 were included. The area where tumor budding was the most prominent was determined, and tumor budding was counted from hematoxylin and eosin-stained section at one high power field (X 200). By performing ROC analysis, the cut off value was obtained in order to divide the patients into low and high tumor budding groups. Results. The cut off value was determined as 1/0.95 mm2 according to the ROC analysis. Tumor budding was observed in 24 (23%) patients. Tumor budding significantly associated with poor overall survival (P < .001), distant metastasis (P = .001), presence of angiolymphatic invasion (P < .001), lymph node metastasis (P = .024), cervical invasion (P < .001), high FIGO grade (P < .001), large tumor size (P = .004). In multivarate analysis, tumor budding and age were found to be an independent risk factor for overall survival (P = .003, P = .014 respectively). Conclusion. Tumor budding is a significant morphological parameter independent of other prognostic parameters in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Standardizing the assesment and scoring of tumor budding, as well as including this entity in routine pathology reports could light the way for ideas in the risk analysis of patients.

Microscopic Sertoliform Sex Cord Proliferations: A Rare Incidental Finding Associated With Endometriosis and Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasia.

Microscopic sex cord proliferations are a rare incidental finding seen in association with ovarian and uterine stromal or epithelial neoplasms and more uncommonly non-neoplastic conditions such as endometriosis and adenomyosis. They may also occur in the absence of other pathology, as an incidental finding in the ovaries of pregnant women and in heterotopic locations such as the fallopian tube. Most reports of this phenomenon describe adult granulosa cell tumor-like morphology. Herein, we describe 4 cases of microscopic sex cord proliferations with Sertoliform features, occurring in the stromal component of endometriosis or in the wall of an epithelial ovarian neoplasm; 2 of the patients with endometriosis had concurrent endometrioid adenocarcinoma (1 uterine corpus, 1 ovary). The proliferations were positive with sex cord markers inhibin and calretinin. As far as we are aware, such Sertoliform proliferations have not been reported previously in endometriosis and have only rarely been described in association with ovarian epithelial neoplasia. It is likely that such proliferations represent a benign non-neoplastic phenomenon. Awareness of this phenomenon is important in order to avoid misdiagnosis as a sex cord or other neoplasm. In reporting this unusual phenomenon, we review incidental sex cord and sex cord-like proliferations in the female genital tract.

PRAME Expression in Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Carcinoma: A Potential Immunotherapeutic Target and Possible Diagnostic Pitfall.

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testes antigen initially employed as a diagnostic marker for melanoma. Although negative in most normal tissues, its expression has been reported in benign endometrial glands. Additionally, PRAME expression has been identified in a growing list of solid and hematologic malignancies and is of interest as a predictive biomarker, as cancer vaccination strategies and adoptive T-cell transfer targeting this molecule are under clinical investigation; additionally, PRAME may identify candidates for retinoid therapy. However, expression of PRAME has not been well-studied in endometrial cancers. We herein evaluate PRAME expression in endometrial carcinomas to better characterize its limitations as a diagnostic melanoma marker as well as its potential as a predictive biomarker in endometrial carcinomas. PRAME expression was evaluated in 256 endometrioid (n=235) and serous (n=21) endometrial carcinomas via tissue microarray. In all, 89% (227/256) demonstrated some degree of nuclear PRAME expression, including 88% (207/235) of endometrioid carcinomas and 95% (20/21) of serous carcinomas. Diffuse (>50%) expression was observed in 70% (179/256) of all cases, including 69% (163/235) of endometrioid carcinomas and 76% (16/21) of serous carcinomas. There was no association between degree of expression and grade, mismatch repair protein status, or stage. The widespread expression of PRAME in endometrial carcinomas suggests this marker should not be interpreted as specific for melanoma in this context. However PRAME may have utility as a predictive biomarker in endometrial cancer, and expansion of testing of PRAME-based therapies to endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinomas may lead to new therapeutic options for these endometrial cancer subtypes.